Context
Literatuur
Vertalingen

1 Corinthiers 7:8

Algemeen

Aantekeningen

Doch ik zeg den ongetrouwden, en den weduwen: Het is hun goed, indien zij blijven, gelijk als ik.

• Clement Stromata 3.10 - Who are the two or three who gather in the name of Christ with the Lord in their midst? 256 By three does he not mean husband, wife, and child? 257A wife is united with her husband by God. 258 (2) But if a man wishes to be unencumbered, and prefers to avoid producing children because of the time it takes up, then, says the Apostle, "he had better stay unmarried like me." 259 (3) Their interpretation of the Lord’s meaning is this. In relation to the plurality, he is speaking of the creator, who is responsible for all coming into being; 260 in relation to the one, he is speaking of the savior of the elect, naturally the son of a different god, of course, the good god. (4) This is wrong. God through his Son is with those who responsibly marry and produce children, and it is the same God who in the same way is with the man who shows self-control in the light of the Logos. 261 (5) Another interpretation would make the three temper, desire, and reason; 262 yet another flesh, soul, and spirit.
• Clement Stromata 3.12 - It follows of necessity that there is no ban on marriage, or eating meat, or drinking wine, for it is written, "It is good to refrain from eating meat and drinking wine," if a person might give offense by eating, and, "It is good to stay as I am." 341 But both the person who takes his food gratefully, and the one who equally gratefully abstains with an enjoyment marked by self-discipline must follow the Logos 342 in their lives.
• Tertullian, Against Marcion 5.7 - 39 We must now encounter the subject of marriage, which Marcion, more continentthan the apostle, prohibits. For the apostle, although preferring the grace of continence,1 Corinthians 7:7-8 yet permits the contraction of marriage and the enjoyment of it, and advises the continuance therein rather than the dissolution thereof. 1 Corinthians 7:27 Christ plainly forbids divorce,Moses unquestionably permits it.
  Now, when Marcion wholly prohibits all carnal intercourse to the faithful (for we will say nothing about his catechumens), and when he prescribes repudiation of all engagements before marriage, whose teaching does he follow, that of Moses or of Christ? Even Christ, however, when He here commandsthe wife not to depart from her husband, or if she depart, to remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband, 1 Corinthians 7:10-11 both permitted divorce, which indeed He never absolutely prohibited, and confirmed (the sanctity) of marriage, by first forbidding its dissolution; and, if separation had taken place, by wishing the nuptial bond to be resumed by reconciliation. But whatreasons does (the apostle) allege for continence? Because the time is short. 1 Corinthians 7:29 I had almost thought it was because in Christ there was another god! And yet He from whom emanates this shortness of the time, will also send what suits the said brevity. No one makes provision for the timewhich is another's. You degrade your god, O Marcion, when you make him circumscribed at all by theCreator's time. Assuredly also, when (the apostle) rules that marriage should be only in the Lord,1 Corinthians 7:39 that no Christian should intermarry with a heathen, he maintains a law of the Creator, who everywhere prohibits marriage with strangers.

Vertaalnotities

Zie hier voor een verklaring van de gebruikte coderingen.
    Zie hier over het gebruik van de interlineair.

Doch ik zeg den ongetrouwden, en den weduwen: Het is hun goed, indien zij blijven, gelijk als ik.

• αὐτοῖς WH; αὐτοῖς ἐστιν Byz ς
• Lacune in minuscule 122, δ 258 (C.R. Gregory, Textkritik des Neuen Testamentes, p. 153): Hand. 1:1-14; 21:15-22:28; Rom. 1:1-7:13; 1 Cor. 2:7-14:23; 1 Joh. 4:20-Judas einde;

Koop nu

Commentaar

Zie de huisregels welk commentaar wordt opgenomen!